Use and evaluation of the quality of open educational resources in the context of universities: the situation at Charles University




Open educational resources, Charles University, wiki systems, quality criteria


The article analyzes the current state and possibilities offered by the use of the open educational resources (OER) within the educational process on the university level, focusing on the situation at Charles University. First, the issue of OER is discussed in the context of higher education and OER quality assessment. Subsequently, the results of thematic research carried out within Charles University focused on mapping these sources and analysis of selected aspects of their quality are presented. The results show that the main open educational resources used in Charles University are wiki systems. The best functioning wiki system, which also has a sophisticated quality assurance system, is “WikiSkripta”. The authors also suggest that the existing criteria for the quality of educational resources need to be modified in an open environment and the new ones, those that reflect specific properties of these resources, especially their fluid, time-varying nature, should be added.


Download data is not yet available.


AAP. (2019).

Alkhattabi, M., Neagu, D., & Cullen, A. (2010). Information quality framework for e-learning systems. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 2(4), 340-362.

Bauman, Z. (2002). Tekutá modernita (Liquid modernity). Mladá Fronta, Praha.

Blattmann, O., Kaltenrieder, P., Haupt, P. S., Myrach, T. (2012). Measuring Information Quality on the Internet - a User Perspective. In L. Berti-Equille, I. Comyn-Wattiau, M. Scannapieco (Ed.), The 17th International Conference on Information Quality - Proceedings of ICIQ 2012. Paris, France.

Centrum pro otázky životního prostředí UK. (2020). Příprava aplikační roviny a šetření využitelnosti v rámci kurzů. Interní dokument.

Centrum pro otázky životního prostředí UK. (2020). Analýza OER na UK a posuzování kvality - mapovací studie. Interní dokument.

Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., & Manouselis, N. (2015). Open educational resources repositories literature review–Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. Computers in human behavior, 51, 1098-1106.

Degrossi, L. C., Porto de Albuquerque, J., Santos Rocha, R. D., & Zipf, A. (2018). A taxonomy of quality assessment methods for volunteered and crowdsourced geographic information. Transactions in GIS, 22(2), 542-560.

Dlouhá, J., Petiška, E., Dlouhý, J., & Kapitulčinová, D. (2015). Možnosti a rizika využití otevřených vzdělávacích zdrojů v environmentálních oborech na vysokoškolské úrovni v ČR: kritéria pro posouzení kvality. Envigogika, 10(4).

Enviwiki. (2019). Politika otevřených vzdělávacích zdrojů.

Fischer, L., Hilton, J., Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159-172.

Hewlett Foundation. OER Defined.

Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573-590.

Huang, K.-T., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (1999). Quality Information and Knowledge. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. In Eppler, M. J. & Wittig, D. (2000). Conceptualizing information quality: A Review of Information Quality Frameworks from the Last Ten Years. In B. D. Klein, D. F. Rossin (Ed.), The 5th International Conference on Information Quality - Proceedings of ICIQ 2000. Cambridge, MA, USA.

Johnstone, S. M. (2005). Open educational resources serve the world. Educause

Quarterly, 28(3), 15-18.

Komunita Wikipedie. (2018). Základní principy. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 13:24, April 9 2018, from

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.

Neely, M. P. (2005). The product approach to data quality and fitness for use: a framework for analysis. In F. Naumann, M. Gertz, S. E. Madnick (Ed.), The 10th International Conference on Information Quality - Proceedings of ICIQ 2005. Cambridge, MA, USA.

Núñez Gudás, M. (2002). Criterios para la evaluación de la calidad de las fuentes de información sobre salud en Internet. Acimed, 10(5), 9-10.

OpenStax. (2019a).

OpenStax. (2019b).

Petiška, E. (2018). Využívání otevřených vzdělávacích zdrojů studenty environmentálních oborů v České republice. Envigogika, 13(1).

Petiška, E. (2020). Otevřené vzdělávací zdroje v kontextu environmentálních studií. Praha. Disertační práce. Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta humanitních studií, Centrum pro otázky životního prostředí. Vedoucí disertační práce Richard Papík.

Podpora elektronického vzdělávání na UK. (2019). Dostupné z (15. 1. 2019):

Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A

disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6).

Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., de-Casas-Moreno, P., & Torres-Toukoumidis, Á. (2016). Dimensions and Indicators of the Information Quality in Digital Media. Comunicar, 24, 91-100.

Shahbazi, M., Farajpahlou, A., Osareh, F., & Rahimi, A. (2019). Development of a scale for data quality assessment in automated library systems. Library & Information Science Research, 41(1), 78-84.


Waterson, J. (2019). Pearson shifts to Netflix-style subscription model for textbooks. The Guardian, 16.

Wikipedia:Editing policy. (2020). Page ID: 9769

WikiSkripta:WikiSkripta. (2019).

Wiley, D. (2014). Defining the “open” in open content and open educational



30. 11. 2020

How to Cite

Petiška, E., Korhoňová, L. ., Pospíšilová, M., & Dlouhý, J. (2020). Use and evaluation of the quality of open educational resources in the context of universities: the situation at Charles University. Envigogika, 15(1).



Reviewed Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>