What is the effect of climate change campaigns? Use of certified methodology for evaluation of effects of climatic campaings

Main Article Content

Jan Urban
Tomáš Chabada
Jan Skalík


The purpose of this paper is to introduce a certified methodology suitable for evaluation of effects of climate change campaigns. This certified methodology sets a framework for evaluation of causal effects of campaigns aiming at a change of individual mitigation or adaptation behavior, or their motivation factors (e.g., attitudes, knowledge, or beliefs). Evaluation of causal effects is based on a potential outcome framework (Rubin, 1974) and makes use of quantitative experimental and quasi-experimental approaches. This certified methodology should facilitate evaluation of campaigns’ effects and should also make it easier to accumulate knowledge about effects of specific interventions. Use of this certified methodology should not only lead to an increase in the effect size of new campaigns, and thus to an increase in cost effectiveness of campaigns but it should also increase trust of donors and the public in campaigns as tools of climatic policy. Last but not least, this methodology should also facilitate exchange of information between researchers who study campaigns but have sometimes very limited access to information about existing campaigns, and those who create campaigns, oftentimes without resources to analyze their effects.   


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Urban, J., Chabada, T., & Skalík, J. (2017). What is the effect of climate change campaigns? Use of certified methodology for evaluation of effects of climatic campaings. Envigogika, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.557


Boden, T., Andres, R., & Marland, G. (2017). Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions (1751 - 2014) (V. 2017). Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2017

Činčera, J. (2010). Metodika evaluace programů environmentální výchovy. Envigogika, 5(3).

Činčera, J. (2013a). Metodika pro hodnocení environmentální výchovy pro dospělé účastníky. Envigogika, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.415
Činčera, J. (2013b). Metodika pro hodnocení environmentální výchovy pro předškolní děti a mladší školní věk. Envigogika, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.413
Chatterji, M. (2016). Causal inferences on the effectiveness of complex social programs: Navigating assumptions, sources of complexity and evaluation design challenges. Evaluation and Program Planning, 59, 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.009
IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (R. K. Pachauri & L. Mayer, Ed.). Geneva: IPCC. Získáno z http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full.pdf
Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj. (2016). Metodický pokyn pro evaluace v programovém období 2014 - 2020. Praha: MMR. Získáno z http://www.dotaceeu.cz/getmedia/9cf7f984-4748-4695-901c-d9b10f12bcd6/MP-evaluace_v4.pdf?ext=.pdf
Orr, L. L. (1998). Social Experiments: Evaluating Public Programs With Experimental Methods (1. vyd.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Potulka, O., & Špaček, M. (2013). Postupy a metody kontrafaktuálních dopadových evaluací pro Operační program Zaměstnanost v období 2014 – 2020. Získáno z https://www.mpsv.cz/files/clanky/17051/Metodika_CIE_MPSV_131015.pdf
Rubin, D. (1974). Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Non-randomized Studies. Journal of Education Psychology, 66(5), 688–701.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (Second edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints, Wiley.
Vandenbergh, M. P., Barkenbus, J., & Gilligan, J. M. (2008). Individual Carbon Emissions: The Low-Hanging Fruit. UCLA Law Review, 55, 1701–1758.
World Economic Forum. (2017). The Global Risks Report 2017. Získáno z http://www.deslibris.ca/ID/10090180

Most read articles by the same author(s)